Pattern Index
Intention Hierarchy
| {Evaluate Suitability of Candidate Patterns} |
Pattern Index |
Intention Hierarchy |
1.Collect
Candidates
| Provisional Name | Problem | Solution | Source/Type | Recorded by | Date |
| LeadershipIndicators | J.B.
Evaluation to be completed later. |
2.Evaluate Suitability
| Criteria | Score | Comments | Metrics | Proposed Actions | Evaluation
Date |
Evaluated By |
| Usefulness | 5 | |||||
| Degree of triviality | 5 | |||||
| Grade of implementability | X | |||||
| Degree of confidentiality | X | |||||
| Quality | ||||||
| Degree of complexity | X | |||||
| Addition of Value | X | |||||
| Level of genericity | X | |||||
| Grade of understandability | X | |||||
| External compatibility | X | |||||
| Cost | ||||||
| Level of experience in their use | X | |||||
| Economic feasibility of the solution | X |
3.Structure
| Derived from | Composed of | Related to | Structured by |
4.Validation
| Comments | Validated by | Date |
 Previous
Pattern |
Informal |
Guidelines |
Formal |
 Next
Pattern |
Help
Copyright ELEKTRA Consortium 1998
 |
 |
 |