This draft agenda can be found at URL:
HTTP://dsv.su.se/jpalme/ietf/draft-agenda-1-June-1996.html.
Revised versions might become available as draft-agenda-2, 3, etc.
The issues in this draft agenda are more fully described in the issues list. The issues in this draft agenda are the same as in the issues list and listed in the same order, except that I have mode the three most controversial to the top of the agenda, to be discussed first.
References:
| Issue | Minutes | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 15 | Require exact match of links and Content-Location headers |
| 7 | 10 | Linked body parts SHOULD or MUST be inside multipart/related |
| 9 | 10 | Multipart/related versus Content-Disposition |
| 2a | 3 | LWSP in URL-s in e-mail headers |
| 2b | 10 | Encoding of 8-bit characters in URL-s in e-mail headers |
| 3 | 3 | Resolving relative URLs |
| 4 | 10 | Support for fast rendering |
| 5 | 3 | Allow File URLs |
| 6 | 3 | Allow non-IETF URIs |
| 10a | 10 | Encoding of 8-bit characters in HTML bodies: HTML or Quoted-Printable |
| 10b | Encoding of 8-bit characters in HTML bodies: Allow Base64 too | |
| 10c | 10 | Line breaks must be CRLF |
| 11 | 10 | Conformance requirements |
| 12 | 5 | Multipart/related become a proposed or draft standard? |
| 13 | 10 | Multipart/related issues |
| 14 | 5 | An informational RFC? |
| 15 | 5 | Implementation methods |
| 16 | 5 | Recipients who cannot handle multipart/related |
| 17 | 5 | Multipart/alternative |
| 18 | 5 | Recipients without full Internet connectivity |
| 19 | 10 | Default ACTION in forms |
| 1 | 3 | Keep Alex Hopmann as editor? |
| 20 | 10 | Reports on implementation status for various implementations |
| 20 | 10 | Future work plan |
| 21 | 5 | Any other issues |